“Walking among the graves”: And Wash Away the Rain

The flow of films with a low age rating increases day by day and is not going to dry out at all. “Cartoon” cinema about unshaven men shooting from large guns, but at the same time not shed a single drop of blood, in a conversation expressed exclusively by censorship and not raising any problematic topics, can bring to the despair of those who remember the extended legs of the concerned maniac, the armor-piercing bullets of the lone wolf, faded hands releasing a bullet beyond the bullet from the right”Kolta”, or just a dilapidated film, found in the personal safe of the old businessman.

In such a difficult time, even a simple tie about the abduction of young girls with the icon “16+” can instill hope on, albeit not necessarily smart, but at least an adult and serious movie.

“Walk among the graves” begins with very frisky and confident steps. From the very first shots, she practically breaks into a gallop: an indifferent and drunk protagonist, shooting in a bar from robbers, a short chase with a beautiful accident, delicious sounds of shots and cold -blooded finishing the last scumbag. Add to this a sloppy hairstyle, a beard and a noir cloak – this is how the main character should be served in the first five minutes of the film!

Further, the pace slows down slightly, as the credits begin, but during this, the viewer is shown … slow macro -shooting of the rape scene. Here I will still express myself subjectively and will declare with all the responsibility that I have never seen anything like this in any film. Moreover, there is absolutely no vulgarity: hands, fingers, fingers, eyes distraught with horror, a tear rolled along the cheek appear on the screen. Yes, this is not at all the “Voroshilov shooter”, or “accused”, but makes his way quite seriously and makes the mood of the film to feel the mood of the film.

This ends for about the first ten minutes of the film and after that the viewer can calmly leave the hall. No matter how regrettable, these same minutes put such a bar for the film to which it cannot reach the rest of the timing. A quick “walk” is replaced by a tedious crawling, the hero of Nison does not investigate anything, as the character of Nicholas Kage did in the film “8 millimeters”-Liam simply walks around the city back and forth, speaks with completely strangers who, for some unknown reason, are immediately recognized in completely innocent things, whether it is the spread of drugs, or complicity of inThe abduction of people and easily fed other information vital to maintain the vegetative state of the local plot.

But let’s try to look at the film in a margin from the first ten minutes. Then we get the middle hand of a story, the narrative in which goes a little boring “waves”: frankly tedious walking scenes and conversations “about anything” are unexpectedly diluted with two -minute dynamics, and then we are again immersed in a viscous narrative.

The characters also do not save the situation www.madcasinouk.net/ at all: they are illogical, pronouncedly emotional and sometimes give out frankly stupid ideas, like giving a rifle to the heroine drug addict, so that it provides support during the transfer of money, arguing that he was in the army. Why not give the weapon one of the “fighters” of the Russian mafiosi, whose daughter was just kidnapped and who personally handed the “barrel” in the trembling hands of Torchi?

An unnecessary emphasis on the black guy, who was probably justified in the first-hand book and helped to reveal the character of the protagonist there-it looks too attracted by the ears. Moreover, the character is terrified with a template and will play on his template “piano in the bushes” exactly once per film.

Somewhere the first half of the film, the viewer is incurred by the intrigue about the personality of the abductors who have a wide range of resources, the necessary skills and access to the personal affairs of the victims in government agencies, but in the end all this is spilled over in anything. At all. This is not explained in any way and remains for the imagination of people leaving the hall. Yes, only here I do not want to think about the film at the end of watching at all. After all the despondency that you have to endure for almost two hours, even negative thoughts seem to be given boredom, and with warmth I recall only the first scene in the bar.

The conclusions are disappointing: Another passing film, deceiving not just other people’s hopes after a spoiler trailer, but did not even manage to keep his own pace, which was given at the very beginning. Perhaps it was worth cutting it – then the “walk among the graves” would be perceived as a leisurely and Nordic detective of the middle hand, driven by the next nail in the career of the Oscar -winning Liam Nison, but there is no. The main problem of the film is that at the very beginning the viewer showed what he could be.

The best comments

They willingly told? So, I check my memory)
Of those whom I remember: actually his customer – he has a wife’s abductors and killed her, cutting into pieces. The main character clearly said that he did not care about his work with drugs, so he had nothing to hide, since he himself was ready for anything to find the killers of his wife.
All sellers and people who saw the abduction of the customer’s wife – he introduced himself as a police officer and presented an icon, so they simply honestly said what they remembered.
Park employee/Third Maniac. It is difficult to analyze its motivation. Partially – fear, partially – repentance. Partly – I’m scravedly suspect and I can judge by it – easy insanity.
One of the previous victims-in general, he did not tell anything.
Someone in an abandoned building next to the place of murder-I don’t remember the exact details, but they first beat him, but after he proved to them that he was looking for a real killer, they decided that their information would help him find the killer of someone close to him.
Who else ..
A drug dealer at the end – his daughter was abducted, so he told everything he could to return her.
Where are the problems with logic? How, you think, such an investigation would undergo? He found witnesses, found that he tied the victims, found the last victim, managed to intercept crops in the process of committing a crime and had a trap. There are no problems with logic.

Now about the explanation of their knowledge.
Two very unhealthy people at a certain moment were connected with the police. They did not hold any serious position, they were either just informants, or were engaged in some very insignificant work. And at a certain moment they managed to steal a small folder associated with the investigation. The police collected data on drug dealers, and they received very convenient dossiers, which spoke about possible money, the degree of danger, family members, etc.D. And if the drug dealer is stolen by his wife or daughter, does he dare to contact the police? This, by the way, is said by direct text in the film.

And about your disappointment – this is not a story based on the secret “who did it?”. Here the whole point is that in general it does not matter who did it. Two unhealthy sadists accidentally received information about people. About their families, about their finances. And decided to use it. They did not have any special skills, they left many witnesses, they were not too difficult to find. But they still managed to become what should be afraid. PEOPLE AFRAID of all the Wrong Things … This phrase contains almost the whole meaning of the film. Another story often returns to the curious topic of redemption, although it does it somewhat rude. But here is the scene of a ragged dying recognition closer to the end, against which the voice reads one of 12 steps … I would call it very well built.

And one more thing: shooting from a rifle requires quite definite skills. The distance required a rifle, and it is likely that among the protection of the drug trafficking there was really no one who knew how to shoot better than this drug addict. In addition, this drug addict usually does not really shake, this is also mentioned there. He, along with the main character, is trying to “take the true path”.

A friend, I am simply admired by such a wall of the text that you were not too lazy to roll out)) I don’t see any sense in a special polemic about this film – the topic is already a couple of days from “necropososting”. I can only say that I respect your opinion and glad that you can adequately argue him;) Apparently, we have a little different perception – try to compare our impressions with other opinions on films that I posted. If the situation is similar there, then, probably, we just have different interests and requirements, so you have no reason to “listen” to what I write =)

What a blessing to face an adequate person!
For the future – I will compare it necessarily)
And about respect – mutually.

I walked around, talked with absolutely strangers, including bandits who immediately and willingly told him everything, and in the smallest details, walked again, got it in the face, exclusively with the help of his charisma made the criminals who broke him and … again walked away. Very logical and extremely exciting.

I really went out to the toilet once, because this tense thriller with a fascinating investigation could not drown out gurgling in my ears. Maybe you will enlighten me, how they explained him?

Disagree with the verdict. The only thing you can blame for the film is of unwillingness to discard some of the stereotypes of those who came with the genre. But this is not a story about the incredible secret of who the kidnappers are. Not a story about betrayals and other things (although this is also). This is a perfectly removed story about what people do facing monsters.
There was no need to expect a continuous action in the Taken style film. This is a slow, tense thriller.
And “nothing is investigating” … He does everything possible to find these two abductors. The fact that he does not do this in the manlock of Sherlock Holmes or himself from the Taken series does not make an investigation less exciting. All his actions are quite logical, and are very interestingly spelled out.
And if you did not understand how the abductors’ access to data was explained, you had to look more carefully. If we are talking about resources … a van, knives, a couple of pistols … They do not have a lot of resources.